Webster defines abstract as: a.considered apart from a certain instance, b.expressing a good apart from the object or c. having only intrinsic form with little or no pictorial representation. In other words; taking an item and focusing on its core fundamentalness. All three definitions very easily fit abstract painting in showing, telling, drawing and painting the essence of the item without actually depicting the item itself.
How does an abstract painter arrive at an abstract design? Many stated that they started with a representational motif, that the motif was something readily identifiable. Chances are they dissected the motif as they say, searching for the bare bones, the essence of the object. They expressed this essence with colorful shapes, some beautiful, some drab, and some just plain ugly.
In any kind of painting the artist is building a statement. It’s easy to express pretty pink flowers in a representational painting. What the abstract artist has to express must be said with his/her simple means; brush marks, color and interesting shapes. Also, since color is arbitrary, color is at the artist’s whim, and may or may not be pretty and has nothing related to the painting’s success https://joomlamarketingtips.com/large-abstract-paintings-painting-for-beginners/.
To make a meaningful statement with no recognizable subject is daunting. It’s not really a matter of simply looking and drawing. She or he must use each of their wiles to interact us in dialog using their art, being limited, or we ought to say, unlimited, with unrecognizable shapes and unrelated (to the object) color. The artist must interest and talk with the viewer through form and color.
A poor, wishy washy, pretty pink flower painting says, “Weak, wishy washy pretty pink flowers!” Bright, bold colors, without form and substance in a abstract painting says, “No form and no substance!” Neither painting is successful.
So….. here we stand in front of the piece of art, having no comprehension of abstract art, its purpose and intention. We wish to respond but we’re with no clue. So, we hesitate in front of the art work, we don’t understand what to express, we don’t react to the color or design, so, we leave saying, or at the least thinking, “That artist must be nuts!” And wondering what the painting was all about. The thing that was its purpose? Was it good art or not?
There are several people who are of the opinion that a painting must be representational to be good art. And if they can’t see every hair on the top and every leaf on the tree, then a art isn’t good. That simply isn’t true. You might choose the see every hair but that is not necessarily a sign of good art.
What guidelines do we have in judging abstract paintings merits? The guidelines that representational painters must follow are exactly the same for the abstract painter. The job will need to have readable values, color harmony and dominance, repetition with variety in shapes, colors and lines, all that relates to good art must also maintain abstract art.
An accumulation of wild colors and shapes does not at all times soon add up to good art in abstraction or representational art. An excellent abstract may be more difficult to accomplish than representational art since the artist is relying on his imagination and intuition to produce something meaningful and of value. (not necessarily monetary value)
In wanting to understand abstract (non-representational) art, approach it with the concept in your mind to simply appreciate what is before you. Sometimes the title gives us an idea about what the painting is about. That helps. Then look and pay attention to how it affects you.
Does the color speak to you? Are you currently lifted up or cast down by the color? You may have some reaction to a bit of art work, it’ll move you for some reason, perhaps very little, perhaps a great deal. Identify what it is. Good art, whether abstract or representational, sets a mood, tells a story, however subtle, intrigues and interests the viewer, and therefore, each painting must be appreciated alone merits.