Social websites along with A Course in Miracles

Social media is much like anything in this world, i.e., projected thoughts with the content of the ego wrong mind. Online attacks locally for A Course in Miracles (ACIM) are via the numerous comments, quotes and other postings wherein we react to our interpretation which in turn becomes the justification for the response (T-12.I.1) or our basis for posting, etc. All students have a simple confusion between form and content as well as what it methods to join so let’s not sugar coat it: Social media is forms (projected content of the ego wrong mind) from joining with the incorrect mind. Therefore, from the outset it’s some attacks until we forgive and start identifying (joining) with the best mind.

Even yet in the Course, we all sit around online with some type of an electronic device mindlessly doing our ego thing. Okay, some could be standing, leaning or lounging:

Sitting around and referring to the Course is not similar thing as doing the effort of studying the text and putting the principles into practice to discover what the Course means (Kenneth Wapnick, Rules for Decision).

In the same Rules, Wapnick also says, “What provides the ego its power can be your having joined with it, your identification with it.” Forms are projected as a defense against the opposite and are only with the ego wrong mind and thus they do not matter.

Since social media is focused on forms which are fragmented projections of the ego, we’re then perceiving the Sonship as fragmented making the error real. Specialness is valued as an idol placed before the Love of God and those perceived differences maintain the separation in the mind. Absolutely any fragmented attribute we judge in another online (or anywhere) must certanly be observed in all the Sonship since we’re really One in reality. That is why attack isn’t discrete and must certanly be relinquished (T-7.VI.1).

Discrete means, “Individually separate and distinct.” All attack in just about any form is the same and is supposed to divide the entirety of the Sonship as it attacks (fragments) the Sonship via differences instead of sameness. Hence, we could see why Wapnick would say it is silly to use the Course as a tool when it’s clearly a Course located in unity.

Finally, let’s add two other word symbol definitions since they are both used throughout the Course:

Demonstrate: Clearly show the existence or truth of something by providing proof or evidence.
Reminder: Something that causes anyone to remember something.

Unloving Reminders

In the Course, “To instruct is to demonstrate (M-in.2) and we’re always teaching, or demonstrating the ego or God every moment, i.e acim audio mp3 the content mind with which we have chosen to become listed on or identify. For contrast, the content of the ego is many projected and different forms; and the content of the best mind is unity, sameness, i.e., Love (no projections). You can find no exceptions. It’s one or the other.

Our brothers are a part of us. They are the ones who teach us who we’re for the learning is a results of what we have taught them (T-9.VI.3) – the ego or God – always. Whilst the dreamer of the dream (T-27.VII.), our dream figures (those online around and our brothers) are doing what we’re dreaming they are doing based on which we’ve taught (demonstrated). Therefore, they are innocent since it’s our dream. We taught separation or even a murderous attack thought against God and so we all demonstrate said attack in lots of fragmented forms. Yet when we forgive ourselves for what we have taught (chosen) instead of attacking, we find who we’re through our brothers who’re the same.

When we are posting quotes, comments or use Course language “at” another we’re really attacking (unloving reminders). If we think about how “at” feels we realize we rely on separation and differences. The commands or demands of the ego must certanly be answered “at” a separated fragment (brother) so we continue to demonstrate our original attack thought and repress our guilt. Course students then go and get online with one of these many ideas of specialness and their unloving reminders which fragments your brain and maintains the separation (the opposite of unity) that will be the problem.

From the social media platform to personal pages, online friends and groups, forms are the give attention to social media. Forms don’t matter. When we say they do, we will automatically demonstrate the ego and be unloving and unkind, i.e., we harm others.

Surely there are times when a note can be loving and helpful, but often it’s not. Again, you should always use being normal as a criterion. Normal people in the current presence of someone who is sick (and any mind that believes it’s separate is sick), especially a buddy or family member, are kind. You may not have to become a spiritual giant or understand stand the difference between non-duality and duality to learn that when someone is sick and in pain, kindness should really be offered to that person. As I have been stressing, when you may not look at fear or guilt, they will automatically be pushed down in your unconscious, and just as automatically will soon be project out – always. Inevitably, then you wind up judging and attacking other folks (Kenneth Wapnick, The Healing Power of Kindness: Vol. 1, Kindle location 149, underline and parenthesis addition mine).

I wouldn’t have believed such people even existed within the so-called A Course in Miracles community. Having been initiated into this community, I quickly started to consider it as a household that needed to apply the Course it claimed to believe in (Gary Renard, Your Immortal Reality, Kindle Location 466).

To say it in another way, social media is area of the dream of devastation, a murderous thought against God. It’s the seeking without (in forms) in order to avoid looking within that will be the heart of social media:

The search implies you’re not whole within and fear to appear upon your devastation, but prefer to get outside yourself for what you are (T-29.VII.4). Imagine if you looked within and saw no sin? This “fearful” question is one the ego never asks (T-23.IV.3).

Loving Reminders

A loving reminder has nothing at all to do with forms because it is exemplary kindness of mind which vision is of sameness and unity – One. If nothing differs, there is nothing to attack for One is aware of God while in this world and sees only Christ in brothers. You might demonstrate something quite unique:

(2:1) For them [those who’re sick] God’s teachers come, to represent another choice which they had forgotten. Your only function is to be a note to others that they may make the same choice you did – certainly not through words, but through the love and peace you demonstrate to them. (2:2-3) The easy presence of a teacher of God is a reminder. His thoughts request the best to question what the in-patient has accepted as true. The individual – really many of us – has accepted the ego’s thought system as true.

To continue doing this important caution, a lot of the time you’d never say the words, “Exactly the same choice I make you possibly can make, because our minds are one.” Love’s presence that will be outside the ego’s thought system is what teaches, not by your words, but by the teacher you’ve chosen in your head, the presence within you. You can be teaching ACIM and get every theological point correct, but if there is no love in your heart, you’re not teaching ACIM (Ibid Kindness, Vol.1, Kindle Locations 396-399, underline mine).

A teacher of God is anyone who has accepted his or her function, that will be to show and learn forgiveness… We teach what we’re learning and, as we teach it, we learn it (What It Means To Be A Teacher Of God, Part 1, FACIM, Kenneth Wapnick).

God’s peace is recognized initially just by one thing: Atlanta divorce attorneys way it’s totally unlike all previous experiences. It calls in your thoughts nothing that went before. It brings with it no past associations. It is a new thing entirely (M-20.2).

The ego commands action (like posting comments, quotes and using language “at” others). The Holy Spirit does not command. It merely reminds (T-5.II.7). Remember, it’s one or another, i.e., an unloving or loving reminder. – always.

Do Not Harm

In the Appendix of, “The Healing Power of Kindness: Vol. 1,” Wapnick reprinted, “Do No Harm to Anyone.” It is a short essay on implementing the Hippocratic oath in to the practice of ACIM, i.e., a straightforward reminder for all students of A Course in Miracles who seek to apply its principles to living in the world (Kindle location 678). He explores how we ought to undertake a close and honest examination of exactly how we having been using others inside our lives to fulfill our desires and needs, and how it’s harmful because we have no regard for the welfare of others. Using people for the needs can be an attack in it which engenders guilt in us (Kindle location 699). A “eureka” moment occurs – I finally realize I have used the written word for attack (Kindle location 709, underlining mine).

Harm is the outcome of judgment. It’s the dishonest act that follows a dishonest thought. It is a verdict of guilt upon a brother, and therefore on oneself. It’s the finish of peace and the denial of learning (M-4.IV.1)… (being an unloving reminder of the attack considered to others and thus ourselves)… Thus, Jesus is explaining to us how our judgments of others are preceded by our judgment of ourselves (M-4.IV.1, and Ibid, Kindle location 729). It states unequivocally – fairly early in his training – that the student of A Course in Miracles must learn that harmfulness must certanly be totally undone or he would never learn the Holy Spirit’s lessons (M-4.IV.1:8-11, Ibid, Kindle location 739, parenthesis addition mine)

If we’re not being kind (no harming and no attacking) we cannot learn nor understand the kind principles of the Course because we’re not putting them into practice. We’re justing sitting around talking online with the ego via unloving reminders as attacks which are types of the same murderous thought because we refuse to appear within and actually do the forgiveness work.

Leave a reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>